The High Court of Bombay held that the writ petition abated due to the death of the petitioner. No costs were awarded.
Writ Petition stands abated. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1) WP No.9289/2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
WRIT PETITION NO. 9289 OF 2016
Hajra Bee Hameed Patel.
Petitioner.
Versus
State of Maharashtra and others.
Respondents.
Mr. Shrikant Kulkarni, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. P.S. Patil, A.G.P. for the State. Mr. S.S. Dande, Advocate for respondent No.2. Mr. A.D. Kasliwal, Advocate for respondent Nos.3 to 7.
CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA & SUNIL K. KOTWAL,JJ.
Dated : 10th August , 2018.
FINAL ORDER :-
. Mr. A.D. Kasliwal, the learned Counsel for respondent
Nos.3 to 7 submits that the matter between the parties is compromised in the Civil Court and the suit is also withdrawn on 31.03.2016. The petitioner has also died on 02.12.2017. The copy of Death Certificate is taken on record and marked 'X' for identification.
(2) WP No.9289/2016
( SUNIL K. KOTWAL) ( S.V. GANGAPURWALA) JUDGE JUDGE
vdd/
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition abates with the death of the petitioner.
Hajra Bee Hameed Patel
State of Maharashtra
S.V. Gangapurwala
Sunil K. Kotwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
