Disposed

Sainath Gangadhar Birmod v. the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee Aurangabad through Member Secretary and

Bombay HC9 Aug 2018WP/9245/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court ordered the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee to decide the petitioner's pending validation proceeding within seven months. The petitioner was directed to appear on 30.08.2018, and respondent authorities were barred from taking adverse action solely due to the pendency.

What did the court decide?

Directs the Committee to decide the validation proceedings within seven months; directs the petitioner to appear on 30.08.2018; bars adverse action due to pendency.

Sainath Gangadhar Birmod Vs the Scheduled… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Bombay HC (2018)

¶1

(1)

¶2

943-wp-9245-2018 (2)

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶4

943 WRIT PETITION NO. 9245 OF 2018

¶5

SAINATH GANGADHAR BIRMOD ..PETITIONER

¶6

VERSUS

¶7

THE SCHEDULED TRIBE CERTIFICATE SCRUTINY COMMITTEE
AURANGABAD THROUGH MEMBER SECRETARY..RESPONDENTS

¶8

Mr. Sagar S. Phatale, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr. P. K. Lakhotia, AGP for Respondent-State.
Mr. Y. B. Bolkar, Advocate for Respondent Nos.2 and
3.

¶9

CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA &

¶10

 SUNIL K. KOTWAL, JJ.

¶11

 DATED : 09th AUGUST, 2018.

¶12

PER COURT:-

¶13

1.The learned counsel for the petitioner
submits that the petitioner has passed the first
year B.Tech. Course. The validation proceeding is
pending since year 2017, the same is not yet
decided. The petitioner is facing problem for
continuing studies in second year.

¶14

2.The learned A.G.P. accepts notice for
respondent no.1. Mr. Bolkar, learned counsel
accepts notice for respondent nos.2 and 3.

¶15

3.Considering the facts that, the validation
proceedings is pending since 2017, we pass the
following order:

(2)

943-wp-9245-2018 (2)

ORDER

(1) The respondent no.1-committee shall decide the validation proceedings in respect of the caste claim of the petitioner expeditiously and preferably within a period of seven (07) months from the date of the appearance of the petitioner.

¶20

(2) The petitioner shall appears before the committee on 30.08.2018.

¶21

(3) The respondent nos.2 and 3 shall not take any adverse action against the petitioner only on the ground that validation proceeding is pending. The respondent nos.2 and 3 may take further course of action depending upon the judgment that would be delivered by the committee in the validation proceedings.

¶22

4. Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

¶23

(SUNIL K. KOTWAL) (S. V. GANGAPURWALA)
 JUDGE JUDGE

¶24

Devendra/August-18

Sainath Gangadhar Birmod v. the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee Aurangabad through Member Secretary and

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sainath Gangadhar Birmod v. the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee Aurangabad through Member Secretary and

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dadabhau Anantrao Kharat Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Venkat Santram Mundhe Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Pradeep Bhairavnath Shingare Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Vishwanath Venkati Bejgamwar Vs the State of Maharashtra through the Collector Nanded

Vasant Zipru Wagh Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Udhav Dattu Murathe Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others