In this writ petition concerning the petitioner's claim for a Trained Teacher's pay scale, the Court directed the petitioner to file a representation to Respondent No. 3 to decide the claim on its own merits within four months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1)
50-wp-1376-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
50 WRIT PETITION NO. 1376 OF 2018
RAMESH TIKARAM RATHOD ..PETITIONER
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS..RESPONDENTS
Mr. Dhanaji S. Kudle, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr. V. S. Badakh, AGP for Respondent-State.
… CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA & SUNIL K. KOTWAL, JJ. DATED : 09th AUGUST, 2018.
PER COURT:-
1.The petitioner claims Trained Teacher's
pay scale.
2.We have heard learned counsel for the
petitioner and learned A.G.P. for respondent-State.
3.The petitioner shall make representation
to the respondent no.3 for grant of Trained Teacher
pay scale. The respondent no.3 shall decide the
claim of the petitioner within four (04) months
from the date of receipt of the application on its
own merits and in accordance with law.
4.Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.
Devendra/August-18
(SUNIL K. KOTWAL) (S. V. GANGAPURWALA)
JUDGE JUDGE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to a Trained Teacher's pay scale.
RAMESH TIKARAM RATHOD
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
OTHERS
S. V. GANGAPURWALA
SUNIL K. KOTWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court