Disposed

Umesh Bajirao Khandekar and Anr. v. State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Bombay HC9 Feb 2017PIL/233/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

C.J. Chellur and J. Kulkarni disposed of a PIL and civil application regarding a municipal hospital. After reviewing an affidavit confirming the Government's decision to take over the hospital, they directed the State Government to make the OPD functional by the end of February 2017.

What did the court decide?

Directed the State Government to make the OPD functional by the end of February 2017; disposed of the PIL and Civil Application.

Umesh Bajirao Khandekar and Anr. Vs State of… — Public Procurement and Tenders | Bombay HC (2017)

¶1

1 PIL 233-14 @ CAI 109-15.doc-6

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.233 OF 2014

¶4

ALONG WITH

¶5

CIVIL APPLICATION NO.109 OF 2015

¶6

Umesh Bajirao Khandekar & Anr. ] … Petitioners Versus State of Maharashtra & Ors. ] … Respondents

¶7

Mr. Dhairyasheel Sutar for Petitioners. Mr. A. B. Vagyani, Government Pleader, for State. Mr. P. K. Dhakephalkar, Senior Advocate i/b Mr. Tejpal Ingale for Respondent Nos.4 & 5.

¶8

CORAM :- DR. MANJULA CHELLUR, C.J., & G. S. KULKARNI, J. DATE :- FEBRUARY 09, 2017

¶9

P. C. :-

¶10

Affidavit of Deputy Secretary, Urban Development Department, Mantralaya, is placed on record and we have gone through the same. The PIL was filed expressing the grievance that Municipal Council is not running the hospital with proper facilities. Since the Government is ready to take over and run the hospital in question, we direct the Government to give reasons why they are interested to take over additional financial burden. In pursuance of

¶11

1 of 2

¶12

URS

¶13

2 PIL 233-14 @ CAI 109-15.doc-6

¶14

this direction on 12 January 2017, the present affidavit is filed indicating the reasons why the Government is undertaking the obligation of running this hospital after taking over the same from the respondent - municipality. Para 8 of the said affidavit clearly indicate that from 2015, may be much prior, deliberations held whether to take over the management of the hospital in question by the respondent - State or not. Ultimately on 21/06/2016, a cabinet meeting was held wherein an approval was given for taking over the hospital in question. In para 8 of the affidavit, it is stated that substantial progress has been made with regard to handing over of the said hospital since the option of handing over was finalized.

¶15

By the end of February 2017, the State Government intends to make OPD functional and all formalities would be over, according to them, by the end of February 2017. Keeping the said undertaking made at para 8 on record, we dispose of the PIL by directing the State Government to make OPD functional positively by the end of February 2017.

¶16

In view of disposal of the PIL, Civil Application does not survive and the same is also disposed of.

¶17

(G. S. KULKARNI, J.)

¶18

(CHIEF JUSTICE)

¶19

2 of 2

¶20

URS

Umesh Bajirao Khandekar and Anr. v. State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Umesh Bajirao Khandekar and Anr. v. State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mr. Hardas Hazarimal Tharwani Vs State of Maharashtra, through Principal Secretary, Urban Development and Ors.

Dr. Rajendra Pralhad Patil Vs the State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, Education Dept and Ors.

Dr. Rajendra Pralhad Patil Vs the State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, Education Dept and Ors.

Courts on Its Own Motion Vs the State of Maha. Thr.Secretary, Dept.of Food, Civil Supplier and Consumer Protection, Mumbai and

Akhil Bhartatiya Grahak Panchayat Vs Union of India and Ors.

Janhit Manch and 2 Ors. Vs Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation and 16 Ors.

Uttam Banduji Pawar Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Courts on Its Own Motion Vs State of Maharashtra Thr. Secretary Dept. of Social Welfare Mantralaya Mumbai and Others

Shri. Nivrutti Yashwant Patil and Ors. Vs the Special Land Acquisition Officer, Kolhapur and Ors.

Maharashtra Krishna Valley Development Corporation through Its Executive Engineer Vs Gena Rama Gavare (Dec) through His Legal Heir Kisan Gena Gavare

Nor Mohmad Ibrahim Mulla (Since Decd) by Lrs Aurangzeb Noor Mohamad Mulla and Ors. Vs Special Land Acquistion Officer NO.5, Sangli and Ors.

Umesh Bajirao Khandekar and Anr. Vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.

M/S. Jalan Dyeing and Bleaching Mills Vs Shri Sahadeo Ganu Kajare and Ors.

Mr. Hemant Anand Patil Vs the Union of India, through Secretary, Ministry of Railways and Ors.