The High Court dismissed three writ petitions as infructuous since the underlying grievances had already been redressed by the respondents.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 WP 7275-13 & Others.doc-9
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7275 OF 2013
Mr. Hemant Anant Patil. ] … Petitioner Versus The Union of India & Ors. ] … Respondents
ALONG WITH WRIT PETITION NO.7276 OF 2013
DDPL Global Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. ] … Petitioner Versus The Union of India & Ors. ] … Respondents
ALONG WITH WRIT PETITION NO.7277 OF 2013
Unicorn Infraprojects & Estates Pvt. Ltd. ] … Petitioner Versus The Union of India & Ors. ] … Respondents
Mr. Drupad S. Patil for Petitioners in all Writ Petitions. Mr. T. J. Pandian for Respondent No.1 in all Writ Petitions. Mr. P. P. Kakade, AGP for State in all Writ Petitions.
CORAM :- DR. MANJULA CHELLUR, C.J., & G. S. KULKARNI, J. DATE :- FEBRUARY 09, 2017
P. C. :-
Since the grievances expressed in the Writ Petitions by way of a Writ of Mandamus are already redressed at the hands of the respondents, the petitions become infructuous. Accordingly, the petitions are dismissed being infructuous.
(G. S. KULKARNI, J.)
(CHIEF JUSTICE)
1 of 1
URS
Mr. Hemant Anant Patil
DDPL Global Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.
Unicorn Infraprojects & Estates Pvt. Ltd.
The Union of India
Dr. Manjula Chellur
G. S. Kulkarni
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
