Dismissed
Uttam Banduji Pawar v. the State of Maharashtra and Others
Bombay HCPIL/126/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 PIL-126-16
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 126 OF 2016
Uttam Banduji Pawar ...PETITIONER
versus
The State of Maharashtra & ors. ...RESPONDENTS
Mr. C.V. Thombre, Advocate for petitioner Mr. A.B. Girase, GP for Respondents No.1 and 2 Mr. S.S. Dande, Advocate for respondent No. 3 Mr. U.B. Bondar, Advocate for respondents No. 4 and 5 Mr. P.K. Joshi, Advocate for respondent No. 6
CORAM : S.S. SHINDE AND K.K. SONAWANE, JJ.
DATED : 21st FEBRUARY, 2017.
Order :-
Sd/Sd/-
MTK
Uttam Banduji Pawar
The State of Maharashtra
S.S. Shinde
K.K. Sonawane
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court