Disposed

Umesh Bajirao Khandekar and Anr. v. State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Bombay HC9 Feb 2017CAI/109/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This PIL concerned the grievance that a municipal hospital lacked proper facilities. The High Court directed the State Government to provide reasons for undertaking the financial burden of running the hospital. The Court recorded the Government's undertaking to make the OPD functional by February 2017 and disposed of the PIL and the accompanying civil application.

What did the court decide?

The PIL and the accompanying civil application were disposed of after directing the State Government to make the OPD functional by the end of February 2017.

Umesh Bajirao Khandekar and Anr. Vs State of… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2017)

¶1

1 PIL 233-14 @ CAI 109-15.doc-6

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.233 OF 2014

¶4

ALONG WITH

¶5

CIVIL APPLICATION NO.109 OF 2015

¶6

Umesh Bajirao Khandekar & Anr. ] … Petitioners Versus State of Maharashtra & Ors. ] … Respondents

¶7

Mr. Dhairyasheel Sutar for Petitioners. Mr. A. B. Vagyani, Government Pleader, for State. Mr. P. K. Dhakephalkar, Senior Advocate i/b Mr. Tejpal Ingale for Respondent Nos.4 & 5.

¶8

CORAM :- DR. MANJULA CHELLUR, C.J., & G. S. KULKARNI, J. DATE :- FEBRUARY 09, 2017

¶9

P. C. :-

¶10

Affidavit of Deputy Secretary, Urban Development Department, Mantralaya, is placed on record and we have gone through the same. The PIL was filed expressing the grievance that Municipal Council is not running the hospital with proper facilities. Since the Government is ready to take over and run the hospital in question, we direct the Government to give reasons why they are interested to take over additional financial burden. In pursuance of

¶11

1 of 2

¶12

URS

¶13

2 PIL 233-14 @ CAI 109-15.doc-6

¶14

this direction on 12 January 2017, the present affidavit is filed indicating the reasons why the Government is undertaking the obligation of running this hospital after taking over the same from the respondent - municipality. Para 8 of the said affidavit clearly indicate that from 2015, may be much prior, deliberations held whether to take over the management of the hospital in question by the respondent - State or not. Ultimately on 21/06/2016, a cabinet meeting was held wherein an approval was given for taking over the hospital in question. In para 8 of the affidavit, it is stated that substantial progress has been made with regard to handing over of the said hospital since the option of handing over was finalized.

¶15

By the end of February 2017, the State Government intends to make OPD functional and all formalities would be over, according to them, by the end of February 2017. Keeping the said undertaking made at para 8 on record, we dispose of the PIL by directing the State Government to make OPD functional positively by the end of February 2017.

¶16

In view of disposal of the PIL, Civil Application does not survive and the same is also disposed of.

¶17

(G. S. KULKARNI, J.)

¶18

(CHIEF JUSTICE)

¶19

2 of 2

¶20

URS

Umesh Bajirao Khandekar and Anr. v. State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Umesh Bajirao Khandekar and Anr. v. State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shri. Nivrutti Yashwant Patil and Ors. Vs the Special Land Acquisition Officer, Kolhapur and Ors.

Maharashtra Krishna Valley Development Corporation through Its Executive Engineer Vs Gena Rama Gavare (Dec) through His Legal Heir Kisan Gena Gavare

Nor Mohmad Ibrahim Mulla (Since Decd) by Lrs Aurangzeb Noor Mohamad Mulla and Ors. Vs Special Land Acquistion Officer NO.5, Sangli and Ors.

M/S. Jalan Dyeing and Bleaching Mills Vs Shri Sahadeo Ganu Kajare and Ors.

Mr. Hemant Anand Patil Vs the Union of India, through Secretary, Ministry of Railways and Ors.

Ddpl Global Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., through Director Vs the Union of India, through Secretary, Ministry of Railways and Ors.