Single bench disposed of Writ Petition No. 2847 of 2016. Court held the petition did not survive on facts and was not necessary to keep pending. No substantive decision given.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
spb/
917wp2847-16.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 2847 OF 2016
Pinto Randell Martin and 3 Ors.. … Petitioners.
V/s.
State of Maharashtra & 3 Ors. … Respondents.
Mr. C. K. Thomas a/w. Manoj Mane, Advocate for the Petitioners.
Mr.L. M. Acharya, Special Counsel a/w. Mr. H. S. Venegaonkar, Addl. Government Pleader a/w. Ms. Kavita Solunke, AGP for the Respondent -State.
CORAM : V. M. KANADE AND P.R. BORA, JJ.
DATE : 08th MARCH, 2017
P.C. :
1 The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners had taken time to take instructions whether the Petitioners want to pursue this petition or not. We are informed by Shri C. K. Thomas, learned counsel for the Petitioners, that domicile certificates have been produced and the admissions have been given to the petitioners and as such, therefore, on that point, the writ petition does not survive. He has submitted that the vires of certain provisions have been challenged in some other petition, which is pending before the first court.
1/2
Borey
917wp2847-16.odt
spb/
2 In our view let the said issue be decided by the first court but it is not necessary to keep the present petition pending.
3 The Petition is disposed of.
2/2
Borey
Pinto Randell Martin and 3 Ors.
State of Maharashtra & 3 Ors.
V. M. Kanade
P.R. Bora
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
