The High Court disposed of Company Petition No. 407 of 2014 and Appeal No. 53 of 2017 based on amicable settlement. The Notice of Motion also ceased to survive the main appeal's disposal.
Appeal disposed of per consent terms; Notice of Motion disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APP. 53-17
VPH
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
APPEAL No. 53 OF 2017
IN
COMPANY PETITION No. 407 OF 2014
WITH NOTICE OF MOTION (L) No. 842 OF 2015
The Loot (India) Pvt. Ltd.
… Appellant / Appellant
Vs.
Small Industries Development Bank of India… Respondent
Mr. Subhash Jha i/b Law Global, for the Appellants. Mr. P. Kumar Jain i/b Prakash Punjabi & Co., for the Respondents.
CORAM : V. M. KANADE, & P. R. BORA, JJ.
DATE : MARCH 8, 2017 PC.
. The parties have amicably settled the dispute and have tendered the consent terms. Consent terms are taken on record. Consent terms are signed by the Appellant and the Respondent and their respective advocates. The undertaking given by the Appellant in para 3 of the consent terms is accepted. Appeal is accordingly disposed of in terms of the consent terms.
Vinayak Halemath
The Loot (India) Pvt. Ltd.
Small Industries Development Bank of India
V. M. Kanade
P. R. Bora
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
