This court extended the petitioner's furlough by 14 days on humanitarian grounds. The judge observed that the petitioner was genuinely ill, abided by terms, and committed no defaults during the initial period.
The furlough period extended by 14 days. Punishment for overstay set aside.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
16.WP2143 of 2016
vidya
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 2143 OF 2016
Ramdas Baburao Vashinekar ... Petitioner vs. The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent
Ms. Rohini Dandekar, Advocate appointed for the petitioner. Mrs. U.V. Kejriwal, APP for the respondent/State.
CORAM: MRS. V.K. TAHILRAMANI & MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ.
JUNE 29 , 2016.
ORAL ORDER (Per V.K. Tahilramani, J.)
Heard both sides. Rule. By consent, rule is made returnable forthwith.
1 of 3
16.WP2143 of 2016
extension of furlough came to be rejected by DIG (Prisons), Pune on 18th May, 2016. Hence, this Petition.
2 of 3
16.WP2143 of 2016
Open District Prison, Pune. The fees to be paid to the appointed counsel are quantified at Rs.2,500/-.
(MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR,J.) (MRS. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.)
3 of 3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the period of furlough be extended on humanitarian grounds given the petitioner's true illness and conduct during the furlough period.
Ramdas Baburao Vashinekar
The State of Maharashtra
V.K. Tahilramani
Mridula Bhatkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
