The High Court of Bombay considered an application for condonation of delay in filing a criminal appeal. The court found sufficient cause existed for a 171-day delay and allowed the application.
Application for condonation of delay of 171 days in filing Criminal Appeal St. No. 268 of 2016 allowed. Impugned order set aside.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
17.APPA461_2016
vidya
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 461 OF 2016 IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL ST. NO. 268 OF 2016
Sanjay Chintu Soman
... Applicant
vs.
The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent
Mr. Abhaykumar Apte, Advocate appointed for the applicant. Mrs. A.S. Pai, APP for the respondent/State.
CORAM: MRS. V.K. TAHILRAMANI & MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ.
JUNE 29 , 2016.
P.C.:
Heard both sides.
opinion that sufficient cause has been made out for condonation of delay.
Hence, delay is condoned.
1 of 2
17.APPA461_2016
(MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR,J.) (MRS. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.)
2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether sufficient cause has been made out for condonating a delay of 171 days in filing a criminal appeal.
Sanjay Chintu Soman
The State of Maharashtra
MRS. V.K. TAHILRAMANI
MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
