High Court rejected bail application lodged by a convict under Section 302 IPC because the criminal appeal filed against his conviction was to be listed for final hearing on 14.7.2016, precluding interim bail consideration at this stage.
Bail application rejected; appeal fixed for final hearing on 14.7.2016.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
7a. cri appa 19-16.doc
RMA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION FOR BAIL NO. 19 OF 2016 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1022 OF 2011
Sameer Gulam Hussain Shaikh
Versus
The State of Maharashtra
.. Respondent
Appearances
| Mr. Mihir Desai i/by | |
|---|---|
| Mr. T.R. Patel | Advocate for the Applicant |
| Mrs. A.S. Pai | APP for the State |
CORAM : SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI &
MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ.
DATE : JUNE 28, 2016.
P.C.:
2. The applicant has been convicted under Section 302 of
IPC. The applicant is now seeking bail.
3. Looking to the fact that the appeal is of the year 2011,
we are inclined to fix the appeal for final hearing on
jfoanz vkacsjdj 1 of 2
7a. cri appa 19-16.doc
14.7.2016.
hearing on 14.7.2016, at this stage, we are not inclined to consider this application for bail, hence, the application is rejected.
[ MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J ] [ SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. ]
jfoanz vkacsjdj
2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the applicant who was convicted under Section 302 IPC while his criminal appeal pending in this court awaits final hearing.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sameer Gulam Hussain Shaikh
The State of Maharashtra
V.K. TAHILRAMANI
MRIDULA BHATKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
