In bail application by applicant convicted under section 302 IPC for burning wife, High Court held case not fit for bail in light of credible prosecution case and rejected application.
Criminal application rejected; bail denied.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
11.APPA755 of 2016
vidya
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 755 OF 2016 IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 806 OF 2015
Dashrath Arun Sasane
vs.
The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent
Mr. Prosper D'souza, Advocate appointed for the applicant. Mrs. U.V. Kejriwal, APP for the respondent/State.
CORAM: MRS. V.K. TAHILRAMANI & MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ.
JUNE 29 , 2016.
P.C.
Heard both sides.
causing the death of his wife. The applicant is now seeking bail.
7 p.m., the applicant poured kerosene on his wife Sharmila and set her on
1 of 2
11.APPA755 of 2016
fire. There are two dying declarations on record. One dying declaration is recorded by PW-9 P.S.I. Shinde and other dying declaration is recorded by PW-1 S.E.M. Kamble. In both dying declarations, Sharmila has stated that her husband has poured kerosene on her and set her on fire. In this view of the matter, we do not think this is a fit case to grant bail.
Road Central Prison. The fees to be paid to the appointed counsel are quantified at Rs.2,500/-.
(MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR,J.) (MRS. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.)
2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the applicant convicted under section 302 IPC for causing death of his wife.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Dashrath Arun Sasane
The State of Maharashtra
Mrs. V.K. Tahilramani
Mrs. Mridula Bhatkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
