Petitioner sought premature release as a life convict. Court found petitioner was already released on 4.12.2015 based on jail chart. Petition deemed infructuous and rule discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
8b. cri wp 361-14.doc
RMA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 361 OF 2014
Santosh Ramchandra Haldankar
.. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra
.. Respondent
Appearances
Ms. Rohini Dandekar Advocate (appointed) for the Petitioner Mrs. A.S. Pai APP for the State
CORAM : SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI &
MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ.
DATE : JUNE 28, 2016.
ORAL ORDER [PER SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.] :
prematurely released. The petitioner is a life convict and he
is seeking premature release.
jfoanz vkacsjdj 1 of 2
8b. cri wp 361-14.doc
Central Prison, Pune where the petitioner was lodged. The Jail Chart is taken on record and marked "X" for identification. The Jail Chart shows that the petitioner has completed his sentence of imprisonment and he has been released from prison on 4.12.2015. In this view of the mater, this petition has become infructuous, hence, Rule is discharged.
[ MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J ] [ SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. ]
jfoanz vkacsjdj
2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner, who had already been released from prison on 4.12.2015, is entitled to premature release.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Santosh Ramchandra Haldankar
State of Maharashtra
V.K. Tahilramani
Mridula Bhatar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
