Disposed
Rewaram Narayan Ramteke v. State of Maharashtra Thr. Secretary, Department of Urban Development, and 2 Others
Bombay HCPIL/95/2015
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
pil95-15.odt
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR .
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION No.95 OF 2015
Rewaram Narayan Ramteke
-Vrs.-
State of Mah. Through its Secretary, Department of Urban Development, Mantralaya, Mumbai and 2 others.
_______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders.
Mr. S. Borkar, Advocate for petitioner.
Mr. Mirza, AGP for respondents-State.
CORAM : B.R. GAVAI AND V. M. DESHPANDE, JJ . DATED : 28th JULY, 2016
Learned counsel for the petitioner has brought to the notice of this Court letter dated 14.7.2016 issued by Collector, Bhandara along with the notification dated 14.7.2016 issued by Rural Development and Water Conservation Department. It is taken on record and marked as Exhibit 'X'.
In view of subsequent developments i.e. establishment of Nagar Parishad at Sakoli and appointment of Tahsildar as an administrator of Nagar Parishad, nothing survives in the petition. The petition has served its purpose.
The petition is disposed of as such.
JUDGE JUDGE
Hirekhan
pil95-15.odt
2
CERTIFICATE
I certify that this Judgment uploaded is a true and correct copy of original signed Order.
Uploaded by : R.B. Hirekhan. Uploaded on:29-07-2016. P.A.
Rewaram Narayan Ramteke
State of Maharashtra
B.R. Gavai
V. M. Deshpande
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court