Sandip Bhagoji Patil v. Union of India and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
What the court decided
1
skc
903-PILL-70-16.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (L) NO. 70 OF 2016
| Sandip Bhagoji Patil versus |
.. | Petitioner |
|---|---|---|
| Union of India & Anr. | .. | Respondents |
Mr. Shardul Singh with Viral Shukla, Priti Patel i/b. Shukla & Associates for Petitioner. None for Respondents.
CORAM: V. M. KANADE AND M. S. SONAK, JJ. DATE : 26 JULY 2016
P.C.:
1] We find that person aggrieved by the issuance of tender has not approached us by filing a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petition has been filed as a PIL. When this fact was pointed out to the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, he seeks leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a petition by a person aggrieved by the tender process.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sandip Bhagoji Patil
- respondent
Union of India
Coram
V. M. Kanade
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court