This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
44-PIL-40-2015.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION PETITION NO.40 OF 2015
Suraj Datta Kedari Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
..Petitioner
..Respondents
None for the Petitioner. Mrs. M.P.Thakur , AGP for the State. Mr. T.T.Pandian, Advocate for Railways-R.Nos.2 and 4.
Coram : SHANTANU KEMKAR & M.S.KARNIK, JJ.
Date : 1st August, 2016.
P. C. :
N one for the Petitioner. It has been stated by the learned counsel appearing for the Railways that the FOB in question is now complete and it has made operational.
2 In view of the aforesaid, we are of the view that cause of action does not survive . Petition is, therefore, disposed of.
[M.S.KARNIK, J.]
[SHANTANU KEMKAR, J.]
1/1
Shivgan
Suraj Datta Kedari
The State of Maharashtra
SHANTANU KEMKAR
M.S. KARNIK
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
