The court modified an order in PIL 44 of 2016, directing that the petitioner's representation be decided expeditiously by the Designated Officer of H/West Ward instead of Respondents 2 to 6.
Order modified to direct the Designated Officer, H/West Ward, to decide the petitioner's representation expeditiously.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
skc
903-PIL-44-16.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 44 OF 2016
Mr. Tushar Guru Salien .. Petitioner versus State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents
Mr. Shishir Joshi with Ms Bhakti Jogal i/b. Ms Neha Choksi for Petitioner.
Ms Trupti Puranik for Respondents - MCGM.
CORAM: V. M. KANADE AND M. S. SONAK, JJ. DATE : 02 AUGUST 2016
P.C.:
1] Application is moved for speaking to the minutes of the order dated 1 August 2016. It is submitted that in the order direction has been given to respondent nos. 2 to 6 to decide the petitioner's representation expeditiously.
2] It is submitted that instead of respondent nos. 2 to 6, direction may be given to the Designated Officer, H/West Ward.
(M. S. SONAK, J.)
chandka
1 of 1
Mr. Tushar Guru Salien
State of Maharashtra
MCGM
V. M. Kanade
M. S. Sonak
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
