Petitioner filed a PIL; court found petition rendered infructuous due to lack of amendment despite granted leave. Petition disposed with liberty to file fresh petition advised.
Liberty granted to file a fresh petition if advised.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
13-PIL-19-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.19 OF 2016
Zubair Jabir Khan ...Petitioner vs. The State of Maharashtra and Others ...Respondents
Mr. Idris Mohd Javed, for the Petitioner Mrs. M.P. Thakur, AGP for Respondent No. 1. Mr. Jas Sanghavi i/b. PDS Legal, for Respondent Nos. 4 and 5.
CORAM : SHANTANU KEMKAR & MAKARAND KARNIK, JJ. DATE : JUNE 21, 2016
P.C.:
Having regard to the prayer clause a) and b), in our considered view, the Petition has rendered infructuous.
1/2
Vishal Parekar
13-PIL-19-2016
3. Accordingly the Petition stands disposed of as infructuous.
However, we grant liberty to the Petitioner to file a fresh Petition if
advised.
(M.S. KARNIK, J.) (S.S. KEMKAR, J.)
2/2
Vishal Parekar
Zubair Jabir Khan
The State of Maharashtra
Shantanu Kemkar
Makarand Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
