Petitioner withdraws the PIL after respondents granted the claimed relief. The High Court accepts the prayer and disposes of the petition.
Prayer for withdrawal of the petition accepted; petition disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
901-pil-118-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (L) NO.118 OF 2015
Vidyut Mukesh Shah ...Petitioner vs. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and Another ...Respondents
Mr. Swapnil Walve, for the Petitioner Mrs. Geeta Joglekar, for Respondent-BMC.
CORAM : SHANTANU KEMKAR & MAKARAND KARNIK, JJ. DATE : JUNE 08, 2016
P.C.:
The learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Respondents have granted relief claimed in this Petition. Under such circumstances, the Petitioner seeks to withdraw the Petition. The prayer is accepted. Accordingly, the Petition stands disposed of as withdrawn.
1/1
Vishal
Vidyut Mukesh Shah
Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai
SHANTANU KEMKAR
MAKARAND KARNIK
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
