The court disposed of the PIL, holding that it served no purpose as the State had already implemented similar directions issued by this court in a previous case regarding the same issue.
Petition disposed of having no purpose to be served.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
PIL83-16.odt
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR .
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION No.83 OF 2016
Chandrashekhar Shyamrao Tembhurne
-Vrs.-
State of Mah. Through Chief Secretary, Mantralaya, Mumbai & 3 others.
_______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders.
Mr.R.R. Rathod, Advocate for petitioner. Mrs. Hiwase, AGP for respondents – State.
CORAM : B.R. GAVAI AND V. M. DESHPANDE, JJ . DATED : 9 th JUNE, 2016
The Court is already ceased of similar issue wherein some directions are issued by this court and the State of Maharashtra has also implemented the same. In that view of the matter, this particular petition for the same would serve no purpose. The petition is disposed of.
JUDGE
JUDGE
Hirekhan
Chandrashekhar Shyamrao Tembhurne
State of Maharashtra Through Chief Secretary, Mantralaya, Mumbai & others
Ravi B. Gavai
V. M. Deshpande
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
