The High Court at Aurangabad disposed of the PIL, holding that the grievance raised was already addressed in a prior order in PIL No. 116/2015 and thus did not deserve consideration.
The petition stands disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
37-pil70-16.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
37 PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 70 OF 2016
JAYMANGAL BHANUDAS JADHAV AND OTHERS
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
...
Advocate for Petitioners : Tope Sambhaji S.
GP for Respondents State: Mr. A. B. Girase
ORDER:
In view of the order passed by this Court in PIL
No.116/2015, the grievance raised by the petitioners in
in the instant petition does not deserve consideration.
As such, the petition stands disposed of.
JPC
1/1
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
PIL No.116/2015Followed¶8
Jaymangal Bhanudas Jadhav and others
The State of Maharashtra and others
JPC
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court