The petitioner in PIL No.202 of 2015 sought leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a fresh petition. The court accepted the prayer and disposed of the matter accordingly.
Leave granted to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a fresh petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
17-pil-202-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.202 OF 2015
Kaju Ramchandra Upadhyay ...Petitioner vs. Devendra Fadnavis and Others ...Respondents
Mr. Rajendra Megh, for the Petitioner Mrs. M.P. Thakur, AGP for the Respondent-State.
CORAM : SHANTANU KEMKAR & MAKARAND KARNIK, JJ. DATE : JUNE 10, 2016
P.C.:
The learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the Petition with liberty to file a fresh Petition. The prayer is accepted. The Petition is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to file fresh Petition and accordingly disposed of.
1/1
Vishal
Kaju Ramchandra Upadhyay
Devendra Fadnavis
Shantanu Kemkar
Makarand Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
