Disposed
Zeevat Shoyal Supariwala v. State of Maharashtra and 5 Ors.
Bombay HCWP/457/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Urmila Ingale IN THE HIGH COURT
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
46.wp 457.16.doc
Urmila Ingale
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 457 OF 2016
Zeenat Shoyal Supariwala and anr. .. Petitioners Vs. State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents
Mr.Manoj Kadam i/b Mr.A.B.Ansari, for the Petitioners. Ms.Shobha Ajitkumar, for Respondents No. 2 to 4 – BMC. Mr.Bhavin Bhatia, for Respondents No. 5 & 6.
CORAM : SHANTANU.S.KEMKAR & M.S.KARNIK, JJ. DATE : 07th JUNE, 2016
P.C. :
. In view of the subsequent events which have
been taken place during the pendency of this Petition,
learned Counsel for the petitioners seeks leave to withdraw
this Petition with liberty to file fresh Petition, if so advised.
With the aforesaid liberty, Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
( M.S.KARNIK, J.) (SHANTANU.S.KEMKAR, J.)
1/1
Zeenat Shoyal Supariwala
State of Maharashtra
SHANTANU.S.KEMKAR
M.S.KARNIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court