The High Court transferred the matter to the National Green Tribunal, citing a specific Supreme Court decision, and disposed of the petition with liberty to file appropriate proceedings before the Tribunal.
Disposed with liberty to file proceedings for the same cause of action before the National Green Tribunal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
PIL.51/2014(21)
1
mnm
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 51 OF 2014
Yeshwant Maruti Killedar & Ors. ...Petitioners Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents
Mr. Ditendra Mishra, Advocate for the Petitioners Ms. M.P. Thakur, AGP for the State
CORAM : SHANTANU S. KEMKAR &
M.S. KARNIK, JJ. DATED : 14TH JUNE, 2016
P.C. :
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioners should approach the National Green Tribunal instead of this High Court.
Whether to preserve the petitioners' liberty to file proceedings before the National Green Tribunal.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Dr. (Sau) Nandini Shushrut Babhulkar & Ors. Vs. Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation & Ors.Referred¶1
Dr. (Sau) Nandini Shushrut Babhulkar & Ors. Vs. Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation & Ors. (2012)8 SCC 326 · Who else cites this
Yeshwant Maruti Killedar & Ors.
State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Shantanu S. Kemkar
M.S. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
