Petitioner in PIL allowed to withdraw petition with liberty to seek appropriate remedy in appropriate forum.
Leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to seek appropriate remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
PIL.92/2015(41)
1
mnm
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 92 OF 2015
Mr. Shriprakash Neel Vs.
Election Commission of India & Ors.
...Petitioner ...Respondents
Mr. Shriprakash Neel, Petitioner in person None for the Respondents
CORAM : SHANTANU S. KEMKAR &
M.S. KARNIK, JJ. DATED : 20TH JUNE, 2016
P.C. :
Petitioner present in person and he seeks leave to
withdraw this Petition with liberty to the Petitioner to seek
appropriate remedy in respect of the relief claimed in the Petition before the appropriate Forum in accordance with law.
With the above liberty the Petition is allowed to be withdrawn. The Petition is disposed of accordingly.
(M.S. KARNIK, J.) (SHANTANU S. KEMKAR, J.)
Mr. Shriprakash Neel
Election Commission of India
Shantanu S. Kemkar
M.S. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
