Petitioner filed a handwritten title-less petition; it was dismissed due to want of prosecution as no advocates appeared and no reasons were given.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP.710/2006(211)
1
mnm
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 710 OF 2006
M/s. Manilal Patel Clearling Forwarding Private Limited
...Petitioner
Vs.
The Superintendent of Licence, Brihan Mumbai Mahanagar Palika & Anr.
...Respondents
None for the Petitioner
CORAM : SHANTANU S. KEMKAR &
M.S. KARNIK, JJ. DATED : 16TH JUNE, 2016
P.C. :
None for the Petitioner. On the earlier date also none
appeared for the Petitioner. The Petition is dismissed for want
of prosecution.
(M.S. KARNIK, J.) (SHANTANU S. KEMKAR, J.)
M/s. Manilal Patel Clearling Forwarding Private Limited
The Superintendent of Licence, Brihan Mumbai Mahanagar Palika & Anr.
Shantanu S. Kemkar
M.S. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
