A writ petition was withdrawn by counsel on behalf of the petitioners with liberty to seek appropriate remedies elsewhere; the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to seek appropriate remedies.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
906-wpl-1260-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION (L) NO.1260 OF 2016
Sanjeeva Naik and Others ...Petitioners vs. State of Maharashtra and Others ...Respondents
Mr. P.K. Dhakephalkar, Senior Counsel a/w. Mr. S.D. Chavan, for the Petitioners.
Mr. Y.S. Jahangirdar, Senior Counsel a/w. Mr. Shailesh Shukla, Mr. Pratik Pawar, Mr. S. Pradhan and Ms. S. Cyros Irani i/b. J. Sagar and Associates, for Respondent Nos. 6 to 8.
Ms. Shobha Ajitkumar, for Respondent-BMC. Mr. V.S. Upadhyay, AGP for the State.
CORAM : SHANTANU KEMKAR & MAKARAND KARNIK, JJ. DATE : JUNE 13, 2016
P.C.:
Not on board. Upon mentioning taken on board.
withdraw this Petition with liberty to seek appropriate remedies as
may be available with the Petitioners. With the aforesaid liberty, the Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
1/1
Vishal
Sanjeeva Naik and Others
State of Maharashtra and Others
Shantanu Kemkar
Makarand Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
