Disposed
Shri. Prakash P. Kukreja v. State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Bombay HCPIL/37/2014
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
PIL. 37-14
VPH
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION No. 37 OF 2014
Prakash P. Kukreja … Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents
Ms. Minal Chandnani i/b Jaiwant S. Chandnani, for the Petitioner. Mr. Vijay Patil, for the Respondent No. 1.
Mrs. Aparna Vhatkar, AGP for the Respondent – State.
CORAM : V. M. KANADE, & Mrs. SWAPNA S. JOSHI, JJ. DATE : SEPTEMBER 19, 2016
PC.
. We are informed that escort fee is no longer charged as part of octroi collection in all municipal corporation areas by Respondent No. 4. In view of this, nothing survives in this PIL. PIL is accordingly disposed of.
Sd/Sd/[Mrs. SWAPNA S. JOSHI, J.] [V. M. KANADE, J.]
Vinayak Halemath
1 / 1
Prakash P. Kukreja
State of Maharashtra
V. M. Kanade
Swapna S. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court