High Court of Maharashtra disposed of Public Interest Litigation No. 7 of 2016 by relying on a previous judgment dated August 16, 2016 in connected matters, without issuing a separate substantive order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
skc
24-PIL-7-16
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 7 OF 2016
Ajay Jaywant Bhosale & Anr. .. Petitioners versus State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents
Mr. Niranjan Mogre for Petitioners.
Mr. Vishal Thadhani – AGP for Respondents – State.
CORAM: DR. MANJULA CHELLUR, C. J. AND M. S. SONAK, J. DATE : 16 SEPTEMBER 2016
P.C.:
The writ petition is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 16 August 2016 in PIL No. 173 of 2010 (Dr. Mahesh Vijay Bedekar) and other connected matters .
CHIEF JUSTICE
(M. S. SONAK, J.)
chandka
1 of 1
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
PIL No. 173 of 2010 (Dr. Mahesh Vijay Bedekar)Referred¶12
Ajay Jaywant Bhosale & Anr.
State of Maharashtra & Ors.
DR. MANJULA CHELLUR
M. S. SONAK
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
