The Bombay High Court Family Court Appeal bench dismissed an undecided Family Court Appeal for want of prosecution as the appellant did not appear despite multiple listings. The associated civil application was also disposed of accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FCA. 28-16
VPH
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
FAMILY COURT APPEAL No. 28 OF 2016 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION No. 44 OF 2016
Mr. Parth Krishnakant Shah … Appellant Vs. Mrs. Palak Parth Shah … Respondents *** Nonefor the Appellant. None for the Respondents.
CORAM : V. M. KANADE, & Mrs. SWAPNA S. JOSHI, JJ. DATE : SEPTEMBER 16, 2016 PC.
Sd/Sd/[Mrs. SWAPNA S. JOSHI, J.] [V. M. KANADE, J.]
Vinayak Halemath
1 / 1
Mr. Parth Krishnakant Shah
Mrs. Palak Parth Shah
V. M. Kanade
Swapna S. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
