High Court disposed of a PIL alleging non-compliance with fire safety regulations by shops and establishments in Bombay, finding the Corporation had taken adequate steps.
None. The PIL is disposed of as no issue survives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/2
PIL 89 of 2014
Vat
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINDARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION No. 89 OF 2014
Dinar Yashwant Sohoni ….Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ….Respondents
None appears on behalf of the Petitioner Mr. Milind More -AGP for Respondent No.1 -State Ms. Trupti Puranik for Respondent No.2 -BMC.
CORAM : V. M. KANADE &
SMT. SWAPNA S. JOSHI, JJ
DATE : SEPTEMBER 21, 2016
P.C. :
2/2
PIL 89 of 2014
Establishment Act, 1961.
SWAPNA S. JOSHI, J. V.M. KANADE, J.
Vaishali Tikam
Dinar Yashwant Sohoni
The State of Maharashtra
BMC
V. M. Kanade
Swapna S. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
