In a Letters Patent Appeal, the Bombay High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging the order dismissing a workmen's compensation application due to a four-year delay, upholding the view that the delay was a valid bar.
Letters Patent Appeal and Writ Petition dismissed; compensation application held time-barred.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/2
LPA 251 of 2009
Vat
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
LETTERS PATENT APPEAL No. 251 of 2009
IN
WRIT PETITION No. 7958 OF 2006
Anil Pundalik Abhnave ...Appellant Vs. M/s. Vidya Enterprises and Anr. ...Respondents
None for the Appellant None for the Respondents
CORAM : V. M. KANADE &
Mrs. SWAPNA S. JOSHI, JJ
DATE : SEPTEMBER 16, 2016
P.C. :
Single Judge. By the impugned order, the Learned Single Judge upheld that the order passed by the Commissioner for workmen's compensation, who was pleased to dismiss the application on the ground of delay caused in filing the application. Admittedly, there was a delay of four
2/2
LPA 251 of 2009
years in filing the application.
Mrs. SWAPNA S. JOSHI, J. V.M. KANADE, J.
Vaishali Tikam
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the workmen's compensation application barred by four years delay since settlement talks were in progress.
Anil Pundalik Abhnave
M/s. Vidya Enterprises and Anr.
V. M. Kanade
Mrs. Swapna S. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
