Disposed
Bhaskar Mahadev Ware v. the State of Maharashtra and Others
Bombay HCPIL/35/2014
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 PIL-35-14
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 35 OF 2014
Bhaskar Mahadev Ware
...PETITIONER
versus
The State of Maharashtra and others
...RESPONDENTS
Mr. Vikram S. Undre, Advocate for petitioner Mr. S.S. Dande, AGP for respondents No. 1 to 3 Mr. K.J. Ghute, Patil, Advocate for respondents No. 4 and 5 Mr. N.B. Khandare, Advocate for respondent No. 6 Mr. G.J. Kore, Advocate for respondents No. 9 and 10 Mr. S.V. Deshmukh, Advocate for respondents No. 11 and 14
CORAM : R.M. BORDE AND K.K. SONAWANE, JJ.
DATED : 25th OCTOBER, 2016.
Order :-
2 PIL-35-14
to the State Government through the Divisional Commissioner, Aurangabad.
[K. K. SONAWANE, J.] [R.M. BORDE, J.]
MTK
Bhaskar Mahadev Ware
The State of Maharashtra
R.M. BORDE
K.K. SONAWANE
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court