19. In that view of the matter, we do not propose to examine the other aspects which are agitated by the petitioners on merits. In that view of the matter, we are of the considered opinion that the impugned orders appear to be result of arbitrary exercise of powers and suffer from not assigning reasons, deserve to be quashed and set aside. Accordingly, the impugned orders passed by the Director of Education withdrawing the approvals to the services of the petitioners, stand quashed and set aside. The approvals granted to the services of the petitioners stand restored. Needless to observe that, as a corollary of quashing and setting aside the impugned orders withdrawing the approvals, the petitioners would be entitled for salary for the period for which they have rendered services and will continue to draw salary, if they are rendering services in the respective institutions. Needless to observe that since the approvals granted to the service of the petitioners have been restored by this Court, the respondents are directed to ensure that the petitioners in whose cases the approvals have been restored, and in whose cases the approvals are pending consideration, should be disbursed the arrears of salary due and payable after verifying their record of attendance, as expeditiously as possible, however, within two months from today, we make it clear that respondent Nos. 2 to 4 in writ petition No. 1030/2016 will be held responsible for implementation of directions issued herein before including disbursement of the amount towards
