3] According to the petitioner, there is encroachment by trespassing into these lands. Mere description of the lands as Khoti land may not give rise to anyone to say that it is in the hands of unauthorised occupants, unless there is application of mind vis-avis facts of a particular case with reference to the provisions of the Act. In order to contend that there is unauthorised occupation of these lands after the abovesaid Abolition Act, several factual ascertainment exercise has to be undertaken. By placing the informations under the R.T.I. Act, we cannot straightaway come to the conclusion that the petitioner is entitled for the relief sought. Further, the authorities concerned may have to call for several records and documents to ascertain the factual material and then conclude, after an enquiry, whether the allegations made in the representation of the petitioner is right or wrong, which is at page 292 at Exhibit-X. If we issue Rule or Notice, it is nothing but taking upon us the exercise which has to be done by the concerned Revenue Authorities. After the concerned department takes a final call on the representation of the petitioner, it would be just and proper for us to consider the matter whether there is
