The High Court dismissed a public interest litigation and two connected civil applications for want of prosecution due to the petitioner's failure to appear or file misconduct cases.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
PIL. 25-15
VPH
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION No. 25 OF 2015
WITH CIVIL APPLICATION No. 46 OF 2015 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION No. 57 OF 2015
Shailendra Dixit S/o. Parabhakar Dixit
Shailendra Dixit S/o. Parabhakar Dixit … Petitioner / Applicant in CAI. 57/2015 Versus State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents And Jamat-E-Ittehadul Muslimin … Applicant in CAI. 46/2015
None for the Petitioner.
Mr. Vishal Thadani, AGP, for the Respondent Nos. 1, 6 to 8.
Mr. Vishwanath Patil, for Respondent No. 2.
CORAM : V. M. KANADE, & Mrs. SWAPNA S. JOSHI, JJ. DATE : OCTOBER 26, 2016 PC.
Petitioner nor his counsel remained present when the matter was called out. It appears that Petitioner is not keen in pursuing the matter.
1 / 2
PIL. 25-15
Hence, PIL is dismissed for want of prosecution and is accordingly disposed of.
Sd/Sd/[Mrs. SWAPNA S. JOSHI, J.] [V. M. KANADE, J.]
Vinayak Halemath
2 / 2
Shailendra Dixit
State of Maharashtra
Jamat-E-Ittehadul Muslimin
V. M. Kanade
Swapna S. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
