Single line order condoning appeal delay, admitting family court appeal, staying family court decree with caveat regarding respondent's remarriage.
Civil applications allowed admitting appeal; Impugned Family Court judgment and decree stayed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CAM. 159-15
VPH
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 159 OF 2015 IN
FAMILY COURT APPEAL (St.) No. 8397 OF 2015
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 160 OF 2015
Mrs. Omana Agastyan Paul Raju … Applicant / Appellant Versus Agastyan Paul Raju … Respondent
Mr. Rajeev R., for the Applicant / Appellant. None for the Respondent.
CORAM : V. M. KANADE, & Mrs. SWAPNA S. JOSHI, JJ.
DATE : OCTOBER 24, 2016
PC.
Appellant. None appears for the Respondent, though served. The
delay of 11 days caused in filing the appeal is condoned for the
reasons stated in the civil application. Civil Application No. 159/2015
1 / 2
CAM. 159-15
is accordingly allowed and disposed of in terms of prayer clause (a).
meantime, the impugned judgment and decree of the Family Court is stayed, unless the Respondent – husband has already remarried.
Sd/Sd/[Mrs. SWAPNA S. JOSHI, J.] [V. M. KANADE, J.]
Vinayak Halemath
2 / 2
Mrs. Omana Agastyan Paul Raju
Agastyan Paul Raju
V. M. Kanade
Mrs. Swapna S. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
