The Bombay High Court at Aurangabad disposed of PIL No. 62 of 2016, holding that the controversy regarding silt removal from the Manjra dam ceases to exist due to full capacity water storage and future government directives.
N/A
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
pil62.16.doc
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 62 OF 2016
Ashok s/o Bansi Tele .. PETITIONER
VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & others
.. RESPONDENTS
Mr. A.B. Tele, advocate for petitioner. Mr. S.B. Pulkundwar, AGP for the State.
CORAM : R.M. BORDE &
SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ. DATE : 15th NOVEMBER, 2016.
PER COURT :
Perused the affidavit-in-reply tendered on behalf of respondent. It is recorded in paragraph no. 5 of the reply as below :
In view of contentions raised in affidavit-in-reply as well as in view of communication dated 17.06.2016 (marked as Exhibit 'X'), nothing survives for consideration in the instant Public Interest Litigation. Public Interest
Litigation stands disposed of.
( SANGITRAO S. PATIL ) ( R. M. BORDE ) JUDGE JUDGE
dyb
Ashok s/o Bansi Tele
The State of Maharashtra
R.M. Borde
Sangitrao S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
