Disposed
Aditya Barthakur v. Department of Posts and Ors.
Bombay HCPIL/95/2015
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
YBG
1
27-pil-95-15
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
P.I.L. NO.95 OF 2015
Aditya Barthakur .. Petitioner
..Respondents
Mr. Aditya Barthakur petitioner in person None for respondents
CORAM : V.M.KANADE & MRS. SWAPNA JOSHI, JJ DATE : 25th October 2016.
P.C.
1] The petitioner who is appearing in person seeks leave to
withdraw this petition, so that he can exhaust other remedies which are available to him. The petition is allowed to be withdrawn as prayed.
(MRS. SWAPNA JOSHI, J) (V.M.KANADE, J)
Aditya Barthakur
Department of Posts, India & Ors.
V.M. Kanade
Mrs. Swapna Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court