Dismissed

Bashir Babasaheb Jahagirdar v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Bombay HC4 Feb 2016PIL/211/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Bombay in Civil Appellate and Public Interest Litigation jurisdiction rejected a writ petition by a Village Panchayat seeking to stop demolition of a building. The Court held the plea was contrary to the Civil Court's finding and inconsistent with a pending PIL regarding the same structure, thus refusing to entertain the writ.

What the court decided

AI extract

Bashir Babasaheb Jahagirdar Vs the State of… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2016)

¶1

904WP1509-16pil211-15

¶2

¶3

pvr

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶5

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶6

Writ Petition NO. 1509 OF 2016

¶7

TEMBHURNI VILLAGE PANCHAYAT Versus STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPT. OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND ORS.

...Petitioner(s)

...Respondent(s)

AND

Public Interest Litigation NO. 211 OF 2015

¶12

BASHIR BABASAHEB JAHAGIRDAR Versus THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

¶13

...Petitioner(s)

¶14

...Respondent(s)

¶15

Mr.Vijay Killedar, for the Petitioner in Writ Petition 1509/16 and for Respondent No.5 in PIL 211/15.

¶16

Mr.Prabhanjan Gujar, for Petitioner in PIL 211/15.

¶17

Mr.P.G.Sawant, AGP for the State in Writ Petition 1509/16.

¶18

Mr.P.P.Kakade, AGP for the State in PI 211/15.

¶19

CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL & G. S. KULKARNI, JJ

¶20

DATED: 4th February, 2016

¶21

904WP1509-16pil211-15

pvr

PC:-

The petitioner prays for direction to the Respondents to desist from initiating action of demolition of building situated in the land bearing City Survey No.272 at Karmala Chowk, Tembhurni, District Solapur. Admittedly, the petitioner was party to the suit being Regular Civil Suit No.446 of 2013 filed in connection with the same premises for injunction. The Trial Court i.e. learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Barshi dismissed the application 'Exhibit 5' by

¶26

a detail order passed on 17.10.2015. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal Nos.44 and 45 of 2015 were preferred against the said order. By a common judgment and order dated 4.11.2015 the learned District Judge-1, Barshi dismissed Appeal Nos.44 and 45 of 2015.

¶27

Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner - Panchayat desires that these subject structures be allowed to be auctioned to deserving persons. Admittedly, the Petitioner contested the suit against the plea of the plaintiffs' for regularizing the subject structures and challenging the decision of the concerned

¶28

904WP1509-16pil211-15

¶29

¶30

pvr

¶31

Authorities for demolition of structures. The Civil Court has reached a finding of fact in this matter. We are surprised as to how the petitioner - Panchayat has now decided to approach this Court in its extraordinary writ jurisdiction raising entirely a new plea.

¶32

Admittedly, plea of the petitioner is contrary to the spirit of finding of the Civil Court. A Public Interest Litigation bearing No. 211 of 2005 is pending in this Court and is also listed today before us. The State has filed affidavit in reply in the said Public Interest Litigation. The petitioner in the Public Interest Litigation urged for direction to the authorities to demolish the illegal structures. Affidavit in reply filed by Niab Tahsildar, Madha, Dist. Solapur, is perused by us. Paragraph 7 is relevant which reads as under:-

¶33

“7. I further state that it is necessary to demolish the illegal structure as stated above and both the structures are owned by the Government. The efforts of the illegal occupants to protect structure is already been adjudicated in favour of the Government.”

¶34

4 904WP1509-16pil211-15

¶35

pvr

¶36

In exercise of writ jurisdiction, we are not inclined to

¶37

entertain the Writ Petition. The Writ Petition is rejected.

¶38

In the light of the affidavit filed by the State, the Public

¶39

Interest Litigation is disposed of.

¶40

(G. S. KULKARNI,J.) (NARESH H. PATIL,J.)

Bashir Babasaheb Jahagirdar v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Bashir Babasaheb Jahagirdar v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sunil Vitthalrao Kotkar Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Vinod Ghosalkar and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra and 4 Ors.

Vinod Ghosalkar and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra and 4 Ors.

Sayyed Hyder Husein Mohd. Tayyeb Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Azad Hind Seva Dal, through Mr. Swatantrakumar Anand (Founder of Trustee) Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Mr. Shilpesh S/O Ramesh Dhurve and Others Vs State of Maharashtra, through Its Chief Secretary, Mumbai and Others

Shri Rajeshkumar Jawaharlal Gemnani Vs Ulhasnagar Municipal Corporation through the Commissioner and Anr.

Aam Aadmi Party and Ors. Vs Mhada and Ors.

Shirur Shikshan Prasarak Mandal through Secretary, Shri Tulshiram Pardeshi Vs Shirur Municipal Council through Chief Officer and Anr.

Zalte Dhiraj Chhagan and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra, through Principal Secretary, Ministry of Finance and Ors.

Mr. Prashant Koshor Garge Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Bashir Babasaheb Jahagirdar Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Tembhurni Village Panchayat Vs State of Maharashtra through Principal Secretary, Dept. of Rural Development and Ors.

Tembhurni Village Panchayat Vs State of Maharashtra through Principal Secretary, Dept. of Rural Development and Ors.