The High Court treated PIL 130 of 2012 as a representation, directed respondents to consider it after a hearing, and disposed of the petition accordingly, without substantive adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1
PIL/130/2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.130 OF 2012
Sayyed Hyder Husein Mohd. Tayyeb ….. Petitioner.
V/s
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
…... Respondents.
Mr Anil Kumar Patil for the Petitioner. Mr. J.S. Saluja, AGP for the State. Mr. G.D. Utangale i/b Utangale & Co. for Respondent No.3.
CORAM: V. M. KANADE &
REVATI MOHITE DERE, JJ.
DATE: 29th January, 2016
P.C.:-
2. Petition is disposed of accordingly.
(REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.) (V.M. KANADE, J.)
Sayyed Hyder Husein Mohd. Tayyeb
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
V. M. Kanade
Revati Mohite Dere
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
