Sandeepani Vidya Niketan Sanchalit and Ors. Vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.

¶1

204-wp-2171-2000

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO.2171 OF 2000

¶4

Sandeepani Vidya Niketan Sanchalit and Others ...Petitioners

¶5

vs.

¶6

State of Maharashtra and Others ...Respondents

¶7

Mr. S.M. Sharma i/b. Mr. M.P. Vashi, for the Petitioners Mr. Asif Patel, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 and 3. Ms. Shobha Ajitkumar, for the Respondent-BMC.

¶8

CORAM : SHANTANU KEMKAR & MAKARAND KARNIK, JJ. DATE : JUNE 09, 2016

¶9

P.C.:

¶10

1. Parties through their counsel.

¶11

The Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution

¶12

of India. The Petitioners are seeking direction to the Respondents to provide grant-in-aid to the Petitioner's school as per the grant-in-aid code as amended from time to time for primary education.

¶13

On going through the issues raised in the Petition, we find

¶14

that there is no order of rejection of the prayer made by the

1/2

Vishal

204-wp-2171-2000

Petitioners' schools. In such circumstances, we are inclined to dispose of this Petition by granting liberty to the Petitioners to file a fresh application before the Competent Authority of the Respondent for redressal of their grievances. In case of such application submitted by the Petitioners, the Competent Authority shall examine the same and pass appropriate reasoned order on the same as expeditiously as possible but not later than two months from the date of receipt of such application.

¶19

With the aforesaid direction, Petition stands disposed of.

¶20

2/2

¶21

Vishal

Sandeepani Vidya Niketan Sanchalit and Ors. v. State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sandeepani Vidya Niketan Sanchalit and Ors. v. State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jayshree K. Raut Vs Headmaster C.U. Shah School and 4 Ors.

Suryakant Mewalal Mishra Vs the Designated Officer and 2 Ors.

Suryakant Mewalal Mishra Vs the Designated Officer and 2 Ors.

Hardas Hazarimal Tharwani Vs State of Maharashtra, through Principal Secretary, Urban Developmen, Relief and Rehabi. and Ors.

Ms Pilloo D. Broacha and Ors. (Senior Cityzen) Vs Muncipal Corpn. of Gr. Mumbai and Ors.

Jagdish Dattatraya Shet Vs Capt.Percy Master