Writ petition allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such upon the petitioner seeking leave to withdraw the same. No substantive legal proposition is stated as the matter was disposed of by withdrawal.
Leave to withdraw the petition accepted; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
207-wp-415-2004
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.415 OF 2004
Ms Pilloo D. Broacha and Others ...Petitioners vs. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and Others ...Respondents
Mr. S.N. Vaishnawa i/b. M/s N.N. Vaishnawa, for the Petitioners Ms. Shobha Ajitkumar, for the Respondent-BMC.
CORAM : SHANTANU KEMKAR & MAKARAND KARNIK, JJ. DATE : JUNE 09, 2016
P.C.:
The learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this Petition. The prayer is accepted. The Petition is accordingly allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such.
1/1
Vishal
Ms Pilloo D. Broacha and Others
Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and Others
SHANTANU KEMKAR
MAKARAND KARNIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
