This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
PIL186-16.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR.
Public Interest Litigation No.186/2016
(Diksha Maroti Barsagade .vs. Union of India and others )
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's orders
Mr. H.M. Bobade, Advocate for Petitioner. Mrs. M.S. Naik, AGP for Respondent Nos. 4 to 8.
CORAM : B.R. Gavai & V.M. Deshpande, JJ. DATED : December 22, 2016.
Public interest litigation for the very same relief is already pending before this Court and the Court has already issued notice in the said matter i.e. P.I.L. No.164/2016. The learned counsel for the petitioner also does not dispute the said fact.
In that view of the matter, we do not find that any purpose would be served by filing multiple number of petitions for the same cause.
The public interest litigation is, therefore, rejected.
JUDGE
JUDGE
halwai
Diksha Maroti Barsagade
Union of India
B.R. Gavai
V.M. Deshpande
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
