In this contempt petition, the contemner was present and tendered an unconditional apology. The court accepted the apology and directed the contemner to comply with previous orders, warning of serious consequences for any non-compliance. The contempt petition was subsequently disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
CP154-15.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR.
Contempt Petition No.154/2015 in
Writ Petition No.2039/2015 (P) ( Sanjay Namdeorao Mankar .vs. Anil Vasant Pardhi, Dy. Director of Education, Nagpur and others.)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's orders.
Mr. R.J. Mirza, Advocate for Petitioner. Mr. N.D. Khamborkar, Advocate for Respondent No.3.
CORAM : B.R. Gavai & V.M. Deshpande, JJ. DATED : December 22, 2016.
The contemner is personally present in the Court. He has tendered unconditional apology. He has stated that though the matters were sent, no proceedings for conducting an enquiry against the petitioner have been continued.
We accept the apology. However, it is directed that the respondent/contemner shall scrupulously comply with the orders passed by this Court. If we notice hereinafter any non-compliance with the orders passed by this Court, we will constrain to take serious view of the matter.
Contempt petition is, therefore, disposed of.
JUDGE
JUDGE
halwai
Sanjay Namdeorao Mankar
Anil Vasant Pardhi
B.R. Gavai
V.M. Deshpande
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
