Mr. Shahed Ali Inayat Ali Ansari v. the Union of India and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Single judge disposed of PIL No. 80 of 2015 as infructuous based on a concurrent order in the related Writ Petition No. 5731 of 2015.
Single judge disposed of PIL No. 80 of 2015 as infructuous based on a concurrent order in the related Writ Petition No. 5731 of 2015.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 PIL 80-15.doc-20
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.80 OF 2015
Mr. Shahed Ali Inayat Ali Ansari. ] … Petitioner
Versus 1. The Union of India, ] 2. State of Maharashtra. ] … Respondents
Mr. Shahed Ali Inayat Ali Ansari, Petitioner, present in person. Mr. D. P. Singh a/w Mr. Sandesh Patil & Mr. Upendra Lokegaonkar i/b N. R. Prajapati for Union of India - Respondent No.1 . Mrs. M. P. Thakur, AGP for State - Respondent No.2.
CORAM :- DR. MANJULA CHELLUR, C.J., & G. S. KULKARNI, J. DATE :- JANUARY 06, 2017
P. C. :-
In view of the order dated 6 May 2016 passed in Writ Petition No.5731 of 2015 and other matters, this Writ Petition has become infructuous and the same is disposed of.
(G. S. KULKARNI, J.) (CHIEF JUSTICE)
URS
Shahed Ali Inayat Ali Ansari
Union of India
State of Maharashtra
Dr. Manjula Chellur
G. S. Kulkarni
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court