This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
skn 1/2 100.15-pil.sxw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 100 OF 2015
| Krantikari Jai Hind Sensa. | ... | Petitioner. |
|---|---|---|
| V/s. | ||
| State of Maharashtra and others. | ... | Respondents. |
Ramchandra Kachare for the petitioner.
M.M.Pabale, AGP for the State.
CORAM : DR.MANJULA CHELLUR, C.J. AND M.S.SONAK, J. DATE : 22nd December 2016.
P.C. :
The main contention of the petitioner seems to be illegal collection of certain amount as commission from the farmers who bring their goods to the yard of Agricultural Produce Market Committee. On the earlier occasion, finding fault with the petitioner impleading several persons as party respondents without even describing proper designation of fourth respondent, petitioner was allowed to carry out amendment. According to the petitioner, one Dr.Subhash Mane described as Ex-Director, Marketing, State of Maharashtra, Pune passed a restraint order directing not to collect any amount from the farmers, however, the said order came to be
skn 2/2 100.15-pil.sxw
stayed by the Government. Therefore, the petitioner is before this Court.
(M.S.SONAK, J.)
CHIEF JUSTICE
Krantikari Jai Hind Sena
State of Maharashtra
DR. MANJULA CHELLUR
M.S. SONAK
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
