This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
40-pil-162.2016.sxw
1
hvn
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 162 OF 2016
Shri Manoj Suresh Pingle
.. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and Ors.
.. Respondents
None for the petitioner.
Ms. Nisha Mehra, AGP For the State.
CORAM : SHANTANU KEMKAR & PRAKASH D. NAIK, JJ. DATED : DECEMBER 06, 2016.
P.C.
None for the petitioner when the matter is called out in the morning session as also in the afternoon session. Petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.)
(SHANTANU KEMKAR, J.)
Shri Manoj Suresh Pingle
The State of Maharashtra
SHANTANU KEMKAR
PRAKASH D. NAIK
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
