The High Court allowed the Civil Application due to sufficient cause for the applicant's counsel's non-appearance and ordered the restoration of the Writ Petition to its original file.
Civil Application allowed; Writ Petition restored to original file; Application disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
caw-314-16.doc
rpa 1/1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.314 OF 2016 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.5941 OF 2014
Gopalrao Bapurao Bhamre .. Applicant V/s. Zilla Parishad, Nashik & Ors. .. Respondents
Mr. Anilkumar Patil, Advocate for the Applicant–Petitioner. Mr. Vikas Mali, AGP for Respondent Nos.4 and 5.
CORAM : SHANTANU S. KEMKAR AND PRAKASH D. NAIK, JJ.
DATED : DECEMBER 5, 2016.
P.C. :
Heard learned counsel appearing for the applicant of Civil Application No.314 of 2016. For the reasons stated in the Civil Application, we find that there is sufficient cause for non appearance of the counsel for the petitioner on 18th January, 2016 when the case was called. In the circumstances, Civil Application is allowed. Writ Petition No.5941 of 2014 is ordered to be restored to its original file. Civil Application is disposed of. 2 List the Writ Petition as per C.M.I.S. date.
(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.) (SHANTANU S. KEMKAR, J.)
Gopalrao Bapurao Bhamre
Zilla Parishad, Nashik & Ors.
Shantanu S. Kemkar
Prakash D. Naik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
